MIT/Tuebingen Saliency Benchmark

Leaderboard CAT2000

Please note that the new CAT2000 evaluation is not yet finished. Results might be subject to small changes.

Click on a metric name to sort that metric. Models evaluated as probabilistic models are shown with green background. The performance under the metric which a model has been trained on is shown in italic. The code for evaluation models can be found here.

Name	Published	Code	IG	AUC	sAUC	NSS	CC	KLDiv	SIM	Date tested
http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~l6zhang/	Lingyun Zhang, Matthew H. Tong, Tim K. Marks, Honghao Shan, Garrison W. Cottrell. SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics [JoV 2008]	matlab		0.7128	0.5815	0.8127	0.2902	2.3353	0.3982	First tested 2021-04-07 Last tested 2021-04-07 maps from code via SMILER. Params: rescale=0.5
Saliency Detection by Self-Resemblance (SSR)	Hae Jong Seo, Peyman Milanfar Nonparametric Bottom-Up Saliency Detection by Self-Resemblance [CVPR 2009].			0.7209	0.5943	0.8543	0.3047	1.7459	0.4110	First tested 2021-04-01 Last tested 2021-04-01 maps from SMILER
Quaternion-Based Spectral Saliency (QSS)	B. Schauerte, R. Stiefelhagen. Quaternion-based Spectral Saliency Detection for Eye Fixation Prediction [ECCV 2012]	matlab		0.7510	0.6132	0.8368	0.3015	1.2136	0.4065	First tested 2021-04-01 Last tested 2021-04-01 maps from SMILER
AIM	Neil Bruce, John Tsotsos. Attention based on information maximization [JoV 2007]	matlab		0.7547	0.6092	0.9680	0.3479	1.3744	0.4093	First tested 2021-04-07 Last tested 2021-04-07 maps from code via SMILER. Params: resize=0.5, thebasis='31infomax975'
OpenSALICON	Christopher Lee Thomas. OpenSalicon: An Open Source Implementation of the Salicon Saliency Model [arXiv 2016]	python (caffe)		0.7627	0.6341	1.1985	0.4142	1.1731	0.4573	First tested 2021-04-01 Last tested 2021-04-01 maps from SMILER
Dynamic Visual Attention (DVA)	Hou, Xiaodi, and Liqing Zhang. Dynamic visual attention: Searching for coding length increments NIPS 2008	matlab		0.7664	0.6089	1.0686	0.3778	1.3032	0.4438	First tested 2021-03-31 Last tested 2021-03-31 maps from SMILER
RARE2012	Nicolas Riche, Matei Mancas, Matthieu Duvinage, Makiese Mibulumukini, Bernard Gosselin, Thierry Dutoit. RARE2012: A multi-scale rarity-based saliency detection with its comparative statistical analysis [Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2013]	matlab		0.7689	0.6108	1.0960	0.3914	1.1489	0.4382	First tested 2021-04-01 Last tested 2021-04-01 maps from SMILER
Image Signature	Xiaodi Hou, Jonathan Harel, Christof Koch. Image Signature: Highlighting Sparse Salient Regions [PAMI 2011]	matlab		0.7704	0.6082	1.0864	0.3898	1.1073	0.4283	First tested 2021-04-01 Last tested 2021-04-01 maps from SMILER
Context-Aware Saliency	Stas Goferman, Lihi Zelnik-Manor, Ayellet Tal. Context-Aware Saliency Detection [CVPR 2010] [PAMI 2012]	matlab		0.7775	0.5939	1.0901	0.3934	1.1093	0.4408	First tested 2021-03-31 Last tested 2021-03-31 maps from SMILER
Boolean Map based Saliency (BMS)	Jianming Zhang, Stan Sclaroff. Saliency detection: a boolean map approach [ICCV 2013]	matlab, executable		0.7826	0.6267	1.1879	0.4190	1.2060	0.4615	First tested 2021-03-31 Last tested 2021-03-31 maps from SMILER
ML-Net	Marcella Cornia, Lorenzo Baraldi, Giuseppe Serra, Rita Cucchiara. A Deep Multi-Level Network for Saliency Prediction [ICPR 2016]	python		0.7852	0.6318	1.3280	0.4631	1.1078	0.4774	First tested 2021-04-01 Last tested 2021-04-01 maps from SMILER
IttiKoch2	Implementation by Jonathan Harel (part of GBVS toolbox)	matlab		0.7916	0.5954	1.1945	0.4318	1.0269	0.4505	First tested 2021-04-01 Last tested 2021-04-01 maps from SMILER
Graph-Based Visual Saliency (GBVS)	Jonathan Harel, Christof Koch, Pietro Perona. Graph-Based Visual Saliency [NIPS 2006]	matlab		0.7979	0.5863	1.2342	0.4460	1.0169	0.4594	First tested 2021-04-01 Last tested 2021-04-01 maps from SMILER
Deep Visual Attention (DVA)	W. Wang, and J. Shen. Deep Visual Attention Prediction [IEEE TIP 2018]	matlab (caffe)		0.8000	0.6253	1.4287	0.5033	0.9931	0.4924	First tested 2021-03-31 Last tested 2021-03-31 maps from SMILER
SalGAN	Junting Pan, Cristian Canton, Kevin McGuinness, Noel E. O'Connor, Jordi Torres, Elisa Sayrol and Xavier Giro-i-Nieto. SalGAN: Visual Saliency Prediction with Generative Adversarial Networks [arXiv 2017]	python		0.8085	0.6354	1.4624	0.5207	1.1155	0.4921	First tested 2021-04-01 Last tested 2021-04-01 maps from SMILER
Fast and Efficient Saliency (FES)	Hamed Rezazadegan Tavakoli, Esa Rahtu, Janne Heikkila. Fast and efficient saliency detection using sparse sampling and kernel density estimation [SCIA 2011]	matlab		0.8212	0.5450	1.6103	0.5799	2.6123	0.5255	First tested 2021-03-31 Last tested 2021-03-31 maps from SMILER
LDS	Shu Fang, Jia Li, Yonghong Tian, Tiejun Huang, Xiaowu Chen. Learning Discriminative Subspaces on Random Contrasts for Image Saliency Analysis [TNNLS 2016]	matlab		0.8281	0.5669	1.5356	0.5574	1.0453	0.5267	First tested 2021-04-01 Last tested 2021-04-01 maps from SMILER
CovSal	Erkut Erdem, Aykut Erdem. Visual saliency estimation by nonlinearly integrating features using region covariances [JoV 2013]	matlab		0.8402	0.5570	1.7411	0.6251	1.5630	0.5603	First tested 2021-03-31 Last tested 2021-03-31 maps from SMILER
Judd Model	Tilke Judd, Krista Ehinger, Fredo Durand, Antonio Torralba. Learning to predict where humans look [ICCV 2009]	matlab		0.8430	0.5654	1.2978	0.4806	1.1327	0.4115	First tested 2023-07-04 Last tested 2023-07-04 maps from original matlab code via pysaliency
Centerbias	leave-one-image out kernel density estimate with uniform mixture component		0.0000	0.8445	0.1166	2.0870	0.7255	0.6652	0.5928	First tested 2021-04-09 Last tested 2021-04-09
Ensembles of Deep Networks (eDN)	Eleonora Vig, Michael Dorr, David Cox. Large-Scale Optimization of Hierarchical Features for Saliency Prediction in Natural Images [CVPR 2014]	python		0.8470	0.5782	1.2092	0.4482	1.1856	0.3997	First tested 2021-04-01 Last tested 2021-04-01 maps from SMILER
DeepGaze II	Matthias Kümmerer, Thomas S. A. Wallis, Leon A. Gatys, Matthias Bethge. Understanding Low- and High-Level Contributions to Fixation Prediction [ICCV 2017]	python (tensorflow)	0.0945	0.8640	0.6498	1.9619	0.7564	0.5137	0.6392	First tested 2021-04-09 Last tested 2021-04-09
Ani	(work in progress)			0.8687	0.6046	2.0657	0.7352	0.6384	0.6411	First tested 2022-05-23 Last tested 2022-05-23 maps from authors

Baseline models

Gold Standard: Our gold standard model is a Gaussian Kernel Density Estimate. There are two versions of it. The crossvalidated performance is the leave-one-subject-out performance where for each subject and image the fixations of all other subject on the same image are used to construct a kernel density estimate that is then evaluated on the remaining subject. The kernel size and the mixture weight of a uniform regularization component are fitted by maximizing the cross-validated log-likelihood of the model. In addition to this crossvalidated version of the model, we also report the performance of a KDE model that uses all fixations on each image with the same parameters as the cross-validated model. One can interpret the cross-validated performance as a lower bound on the explainable performance and the joint performance as an upper bound.
Centerbias: The center bias model is again a Gaussian Kernel Density Estimate. However, unlike the gold standard, it uses the fixations of all other images to predict the fixations on any given image. Kernel size and the mixture weight oa a uniform regularization component are again fitted by maximizing the model log-likelihood.